One walker observed a house of post-war red-brick design among a pre-war pebbledash row in Hazelwood Drive. To be clear, Hazelwood Drive south. As with many homes in Beechwood Avenue south and all of Woodland Drive south this 1930s development was the preserve of builder A A Welch. He had completed Woodland Drive south, both sides, and the odds of Hazelwood Drive south, temporarily reserving plots in each road for a work site which today would be called a compound. A wedge shape at 1 and 3 Woodland Drive and a larger rectangle between 1 and 11 Hazelwood Drive.
Hazelwood Drive south - a post-war house nestles among the Welch-built 1930s homes; a former builders' compound. COURTESY GOOGLE EARTH |
Aerial phone taken in March 1939. Hazelwood Drive is extreme right. Rectangular builders' compound near bottom end with historic oak tree in top left corner. COURTESY HISTORIC ENGLAND |
A similar query was raised a while back about house numbering in Beechwood Avenue, for which a certain answer is not clear; and for a development which progressed along the road in sequence, is rather puzzling. From Beaumont Avenue we have numbers 1 and 3, then 3a and 5, 7 and 9 and so on. Why was 3a necessary? The most logical answer might come from the way the first pair face towards the junction instead of parallel with Beechwood Avenue. It is possible the developer initially intended the first plot to be for a detached house. The Post Office seems to have been prompt in allocating numbers, perhaps too prompt for a builder whose change of mind resulted in a pair of semis instead. It would certainly be the reason for the resulting awkward plot boundaries and the need for a 3a in the sequence. Of course, if there is a different account ...
Junction of Beechwood and Beaumont avenues. Two former builders' compounds are in this photo. COURTESY GOOGLE EARTH |
While referring earlier to builders' compounds, H C Janes, which constructed homes on the opposite side of Beechwood and in Elm Drive in the early 1930s, had a compound where number 267 Hatfield Road appeared in the 1960s. A similar compound had been left in Beaumont Avenue which is today the location of number 2.
All that from a pair of queries resulting from everyday walks!